[nflug] NFS noac option
Justin Bennett
Justin.Bennett at Dynabrade.com
Thu Apr 20 13:29:53 EDT 2006
ok. All my auto.x entries are mounting as -soft. I can take the -soft out.
Justin Bennett
Network Administrator
Dynabrade, Inc.
8989 Sheridan Dr.
Clarence, NY 14031
Darin Perusich wrote:
> i don't specify any client side mount options but hard is the default.
> i always use autofs, this allows for dynamically adding nfs
> filesystems as i'm sure you know.
>
> Justin Bennett wrote:
>> Thanks for the link, what's the generally preferred method? 'hard,intr'?
>>
>> Darin Perusich wrote:
>>> see http://nfs.sourceforge.net/#faq_e4 for the "risks of using
>>> "soft" mounts" as they put it.
>>>
>>> Justin Bennett wrote:
>>>> Mail is delivered / served from these as well, everything would
>>>> just log jam behind the hard mounts, trying to shut services down
>>>> on the way down, and then ultimatly the NFS and NFSLOCK on services
>>>> on the client shutting down. I found the soft mounts allowed things
>>>> to error out and shutdown cleanly before the UPS died. Is there a
>>>> downfall about soft mounts I'm missing, other than things may error
>>>> out if the NFS box is down?
>>>>
>>>> Darin Perusich wrote:
>>>>> that sounds to me like your other services where not stopped
>>>>> before the file systems where trying to unmount. i know that samba
>>>>> doesn't care about open files when you tell it to stop. it usually
>>>>> the same for nfsd, it doesn't care if clients have resources
>>>>> mount, it just stops serving the FS and the clients get stale nfs
>>>>> handles.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nflug mailing list
>> nflug at nflug.org
>> http://www.nflug.org/mailman/listinfo/nflug
>
_______________________________________________
nflug mailing list
nflug at nflug.org
http://www.nflug.org/mailman/listinfo/nflug
More information about the nflug
mailing list