[nflug] Routing Problem that I would love some input on

[Brad Bartram]

Grr, I was hoping there was a way to do it just using the routing tables.
Somehow I had it set in my brain that there was a way, but I just forgot how
to do it.  Oh well, I guess I'll go back to my original idea and just put
the apps on different boxes and not worry about dealing with iptables or any
of that jazz.

Thanks for the responses.

On 10/25/07, Robert Wolfe <robertwolfe at localnet.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:21:41 -0400
> "Mark Musone" <mmusone at shatterit.com> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, using standard routing tables, you can't L (I've been
> down
> > this road before)
>
> Same here, I've just been too busy today to answer the original posting :P
>
> > It's going to go out your default route. (Remember when we had that
> problem
> > with one of your customers and we put them on a different network..the
> > inbound packets were fine, but the outbound ones went out the original
> > provider)
>
> Yeah, it would be nice if you COULD do what was originally inquired about.
> If it were possible in ANY way, I could load balance all my network
> traffic without any problems :)  (well, without spending loads of money,
> too <G>).
>
> > The other option is to use iptables..i think you might be able to do
> some
> > dependency routing and send data out specific nic cards (or at least do
> some
> > header nagling)
>
> Ugh!  There's that nasty word again, "iptables."  Almost as nasty as "vi."
> :P
>
> --
>      Robert Wolfe (robertwolfe at localnet.com) | Systems Administrator
>        LocalNet Corp | Williamsville, NY | http://www.localnet.com
> _______________________________________________
> nflug mailing list
> nflug at nflug.org
> http://www.nflug.org/mailman/listinfo/nflug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nflug.org/pipermail/nflug/attachments/20071025/fb28a3d2/attachment-0001.html