Netiquette (Was: Re: Squirrelmail and Courier)

[John Seth]

My sentiments exactly.
-- 



> I'm on dialup and if someone really needs to post a screen shot or other
> graphic to get a point across, it doesn't bother me as long as it's once
> in a while - and people have the sense to chop it out of replies so it
> doesn't get sent multiple times.
>
> Joe
>
> Mark T. Valites wrote:
>
>>On 29 Sep 2003, Cyber Source wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>It might be hard or impossible to send a url if they have no server,
>>>etc. I would suggest to the people that see an attachment and
>>>don't/can't download it, not too open it at all. That file was only
>>>116k.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>This isn't the first time I've commented on an attachment sent to the
>>list. Even at 116k, a list member stuck on dial-ip, who is using pop is
>>FORCED to download the image, even if they have no interest in viewing
>> it.
>>Multiply 116k by the number of list members of list members, and
>> suddenly
>>it's not such a small number.
>>
>>RFC 1855 - Netiquette Guildelines provides further suggestions and
>>probably offers a better wording that what I have suggested.
>>
>>http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
>>
>>-Mark
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> "One does not discover the new lands without consenting to lose sight of
> the shore for a very long time." --Andre Gide
>
>
>