[nflug] Meetings - A Brief History of NFLUG and its Future

[Christopher Hawkins]

I think more enterprise focus would be great. The more we learn from each other, the more value the group has... Personally I get no value add from an "installfest" type meeting so I have avoided LUG meetings as a participant, though I have done a couple elsewhere as an instructor. But if there were going to be presentations where I would learn new stuff, I would start attending meetings and get involved. 

I don't think that's mutually exclusive with having a "newbie friendly" group... And I agree that splintering into two groups would be probably be bad.

Chris  

----- "Jesse Jarzynka" <jesse at jessejoe.com> wrote:

> I think it's great to cover enterprise topics, but I think a name like
> 
> that would deter membership. It's important if we focus on more
> advanced 
> topics that some of us may like we also keep a friendly welcoming 
> atmosphere so that new users feel comfortable. I always liked at 
> meetings when Brad would present something cool then we could all have
> 
> time to chat, talk about what we're up to, get advice on certain
> things 
> etc. -Jesse
> 
> Timothy Finucane wrote:
> > I all for combining everything into one group. Name doesn't matter 
> > much to me. It's the mailing list I watch the most as it is full of
> 
> > useful information. The fewer I have to be subscribed to the
> better.
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > Timothy J. Finucane
> >
> > http://www.speljamr.com
> >
> > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/p/Timothy_J_Finucane/682422189
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nflug mailing list
> > nflug at nflug.org
> > http://www.nflug.org/mailman/listinfo/nflug
> >   
> _______________________________________________
> nflug mailing list
> nflug at nflug.org
> http://www.nflug.org/mailman/listinfo/nflug