[nflug] NFS noac option
Justin Bennett
Justin.Bennett at Dynabrade.com
Thu Apr 20 13:10:21 EDT 2006
Thanks for the link, what's the generally preferred method? 'hard,intr'?
Justin Bennett
Network Administrator
Dynabrade, Inc.
8989 Sheridan Dr.
Clarence, NY 14031
Darin Perusich wrote:
> see http://nfs.sourceforge.net/#faq_e4 for the "risks of using "soft"
> mounts" as they put it.
>
> Justin Bennett wrote:
>> Mail is delivered / served from these as well, everything would just
>> log jam behind the hard mounts, trying to shut services down on the
>> way down, and then ultimatly the NFS and NFSLOCK on services on the
>> client shutting down. I found the soft mounts allowed things to error
>> out and shutdown cleanly before the UPS died. Is there a downfall
>> about soft mounts I'm missing, other than things may error out if the
>> NFS box is down?
>>
>> Darin Perusich wrote:
>>> that sounds to me like your other services where not stopped before
>>> the file systems where trying to unmount. i know that samba doesn't
>>> care about open files when you tell it to stop. it usually the same
>>> for nfsd, it doesn't care if clients have resources mount, it just
>>> stops serving the FS and the clients get stale nfs handles.
>>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
nflug mailing list
nflug at nflug.org
http://www.nflug.org/mailman/listinfo/nflug
More information about the nflug
mailing list