fedora 4 question

[Cyber Source]

all FC releases are "public beta", they have all been very stable with 
varying degrees of quirks here and there, probably with FC2 having the 
most quirks (gnomewise that is). The nice thing is tons of people are 
all over it and quirks/bugs usually get fixed asap or as soon as become 
known. The hardest part of FC is keeping up with all the changes but it 
keeps you on your toes and keeps you on the cutting edge. I would go 
with FC4, if you find an issue, it will most likely get fixed quickly, IMHO.

DANIEL MAGNUSZEWSKI wrote:

>..is it the general consensus that FC 4 is stable enough to run on
>production servers? Or is there still work to be done on it? I am
>debating on whether to use FC 3 or FC 4 on a network monitoring server
>that I'm about to install. 
>
>Any thoughts? Thanks.
>
>
>  
>
>>>>peter at thecybersource.com 07/07/05 1:43 PM >>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>We started dabblin in FC4 getting it ready for our new system dump and
>I 
>know Jesse mentioned this and I believe it's fixed. He could tell you 
>better as he has been playin with it but it would probably be fixed 
>doing an apt-get upgrade.
>
>anthonyriga wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Not sure if this was a change from Fedora 3 to 4 but I
>>noticed that when Fed 4 is shutting down the screen
>>does not show any processes shutting down. The screen
>>is just black. In Fed 3 and other *nix it shows all
>>the procceses shutting down. IS this that something
>>that has changed? My personal preference is to see
>>what is shutting down and how far the process is and
>>to see if there are errors. Also too I did do a
>>sucessful channel bonding for  load balance and
>>failover with 2 nic cards and it worked great. 
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>