samba 3.0

Justin Bennett justin.bennett at dynabrade.com
Thu Jan 22 08:31:07 EST 2004


Even with Pcnetlink you have to turn the Encryption off. My biggest 
issue was the joining the domain, and the GUI tools. Our help desk guy 
usually manages that, If I need to add the machine accounts manually it 
means it's something else I have to do.. :)

Justin Bennett
Network Administrator
RHCE (Redhat Certified Linux Engineer)
Dynabrade, Inc.
8989 Sheridan Dr.
Clarence, NY 14031
 



Carl Yost Jr wrote:

>No I still use smbpasswd add for the users and machine accounts. I log nt/2000/xp box's into it fine. XP requires the encryption shutoff, and they log in fine for me. I have the roaming profiles and everything running. 
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Justin Bennett <justin.bennett at dynabrade.com>
>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:16:27 -0500
>To: nflug at nflug.org
>Subject: Re: samba 3.0
>
>  
>
>>Are you logging 2000 or XP boxes into it? I remember trying to set it up 
>>and It was giving me greif. It works great for file and printer sharing, 
>>but NT (includes xp + 2000) were giving me greif logging in. I had to 
>>create machine accounts manually, with PC netlink you can have the NT 
>>machine create it's account on the pcnetlink box when you joined the 
>>domain. Also using the NT gui tools to add users was very flakey. Just 
>>wondering if they cleaned any of that  up.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Justin Bennett
>>Network Administrator
>>RHCE (Redhat Certified Linux Engineer)
>>Dynabrade, Inc.
>>8989 Sheridan Dr.
>>Clarence, NY 14031
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>Carl Yost Jr wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>meant version 2.x.x :)
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: Justin Bennett <justin.bennett at dynabrade.com>
>>>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:47:56 -0500
>>>To: nflug at nflug.org
>>>Subject: samba 3.0
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Anyone Using samba 3.0? I've been using 2.2.7 without a problem. The 
>>>>domain logon stuff for NT/2000/XP was always a little flakey with it. I 
>>>>couldn't get it running to my liking. I've been using PCNetlink on 
>>>>solaris for the logons, but this requires a solaris box just for domain 
>>>>logons. Has anyone tried this under version 3? Is it cleaned up at all, 
>>>>can you use the standard NT user managers?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>Justin
>>>>
>>>>-- 
>>>>Justin Bennett
>>>>Network Administrator
>>>>RHCE (Redhat Certified Linux Engineer)
>>>>Dynabrade, Inc.
>>>>8989 Sheridan Dr.
>>>>Clarence, NY 14031
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>



More information about the nflug mailing list