apt-get/Synaptic
Jesse Jarzynka
denisesballs at thecybersource.com
Sun Dec 19 12:52:46 EST 2004
Advent Systems wrote:
> Yes. When you run updates you want as little going on "system wise"
> as possible (synaptic, etc.), so rather then run apt-get from a
> terminal window while X and gnome are running (which are "big" system
> wise) would it not make more sense to shut them down and have as
> little running as possible when you do updates, or does it really not
> matter what is running when preforming updates?
>
> Bob Randal
>
> Jesse Jarzynka wrote:
>
>> Advent Systems wrote:
>>
>>> Jesse,
>>> Not having the synaptic gui running makes sense during updates
>>> but do you also shut down X (go to run level 3) which seems to me
>>> has way more stuff "going on" then synaptic?
>>>
>> I don't think I understand your question. You mean physically log out
>> and go to run level 3 just to run updates? -Jesse
>>
Nah, I think that's getting a little crazy. The only time I've ever done
that was on a tired old machine with 128mb of ram, and a 600mhz cpu. I
don't think gnome and especially a terminal window are terrible memory
hogs. The guys might have more to say about this though. Anyone? -Jesse
More information about the nflug
mailing list