Switching to Redhat
Robert Dege
rdege at cse.Buffalo.EDU
Wed Mar 26 10:18:26 EST 2003
I have. That's why I asked. In RH8, GNOME uses opaque moving of all
apps. Along with True Type fonts, and full support of anti-aliasing, it
can really take a toll on the CPU/RAM.
Watching `make bzImage` run is bad. It doesn't scroll.... The text
output spits out..... in chunks. A chunk here, a chunk there. Moving
the term spikes the CPU load. After moving the window, I could watch
as GNOME would refresh & overlay the text with the anti-aliasing effect.
I was able to disable the TTF & antialiasing, but I was unable to find a
way to remove opaque moving, or resizing.
I also don't run up2date, so all the packages I'm running are vanilla to
the release. So there might be updated packages that address this.
-Rob
> as compared with kde, at least in RH8. GUI response and application
> reaction (opening and closing), seem to be way faster. Try it.
> On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 09:13, Robert Dege wrote:
> > > I'll second that. One of these days I will get into Gnome because that
> > > seems WAY fast, just still can't do simple things with it like change
> >
> > Gnome is way fast compared to what? In my experience, KDE has always
> > seemed faster than gnome. Either that of KDE is less CPU intensive,
> > allowing me to run more apps simultaneously without lag.
> >
> > However, this is comparing it on a 500MHz K6-2, so it doesn't take a lot
> > to make my poor xmms skip like a bad vinyl.
> >
> > Dege
> >
> > So Many Things in Life Would Be Really Funny
> > .... If They Weren't Happening To Me
> --
> Cyber Source <peter at thecybersource.com>
>
>
Dege
So Many Things in Life Would Be Really Funny
.... If They Weren't Happening To Me
More information about the nflug
mailing list