rpm failed dependencies

[S. Lawton]

On Sunday 07 July 2002 06:16 pm, peter wrote 
about Re: rpm failed dependencies:
> I would d/l the files that evolution deps on, evidently newer stuff
> ie bonobo>= 1.0.19
> libgtkhtml20 >= 1.0.3
> gtkhtml >= 1.0.3
> libgal19 >= 0.19.2
> bonobo-conf >= 0.15
> oaf >= 0.6.7
> gal >= 0.19.2
>
> the *.so files should be included in the above. The order of
> installation is not that critical if you put all these files in the
> same dir that you have evolution in, and you d/l'ed them from the
> same dir. That's what I usually do for large upgrades, then just cd
> into that dir and do
> rpm -Uvh *.rpm
>
> provided that the dir you [put all these files in was empty to
> begin with. Usuallu a temp dir in one's home is sufficient.
>
> HTH
>
> pete

COOL !
rpm -Update verbose hash-marks ALL rpms 
I never would have thought to put a wild-card THERE. 
What a time saver.  I'll remember that one, Thanks. 
-- 
S. Lawton

Kmail 1.3.1