partitions

Cyber Source peter at thecybersource.com
Thu Sep 18 11:45:26 EDT 2003


I'm not sure if this would be a problem but I have noticed that your fat
partitions are ID'd as "b" with the extended partition being ID'd as
"f". A "b" represents a partition that is NOT lba and an "f" represents
an extended partition that IS lba. I just have never seen a partition
with the newer drives of today partitioned without lba. That may be
causing you problems, seeing that the extended is lba but not the
partitions within. Just a guess.

On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 11:21, Mark Robson wrote:

> Here it is:
> 
> [root at localhost root]# fdisk -l
> 
> Disk /dev/hdc: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1048 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
> 
>    Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id 
> System
> /dev/hdc2   *         2      1048   8410027+   f 
> Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
> /dev/hdc5             2       129   1028128+   b 
> Win95 FAT32
> /dev/hdc6           130      1048   7381836    b 
> Win95 FAT32
> 
> Disk /dev/hdd: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1313 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
> 
>    Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id 
> System
> /dev/hdd1   *         1        13    104391   83 
> Linux
> /dev/hdd2            14       751   5927985   83 
> Linux
> /dev/hdd3           752       848    779152+  82 
> Linux swap
> /dev/hdd4           849      1313   3735112+   f 
> Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
> /dev/hdd5           849       913    522081   83 
> Linux
> /dev/hdd6           914      1183   2168743+  83 
> Linux
> /dev/hdd7          1184      1313   1044193+  83 
> Linux
> 
> Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 9729 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
> 
>    Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id 
> System
> /dev/hda1   *         1      4978  39985753+   c 
> Win95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda2          4979      8207  25936942+   f 
> Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
> /dev/hda5          4979      8207  25936911    b 
> Win95 FAT32
> 
> 
> 
> --- Robert Meyer <meyer_rm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hmmm... sounds like the partitions may be
> > overlapping?  The output of 'fdisk
> > -l' might be useful for us to help...
> > 
> > Cheers!
> > 
> > Bob
> > 
> > --- Mark Robson <markrobson at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Oh, good catch, Bob, I now remember we must all
> > wish
> > > you well for Friday.  Speedy recovery, and all. 
> > > Unfortunately, that may knock me off again.  I've
> > > meant to get to a meeting for the last six months,
> > but
> > > it seems to be jinxed.  
> > > 
> > > Well, got  fdisk -l dev/hda to report that in fact
> > I
> > > have hda1 and hda5 patitions,  no hda2 to mount.  
> > > 
> > > Now, when I have both FAT partitions mounted,
> > system
> > > locks up catastrophically.  No mouse, kbd,
> > nothing. 
> > > Only responds to hard reset.  Doesn't happen with
> > just
> > > one or the other singly, only when I mount both. 
> > > Well, it did that twice, but now I've got both
> > > mounted, and it isn't locking up yet.  Makes me
> > wonder
> > > if the drive itself is failing, thus the corrupted
> > > drivers?  Is there a way to tell if this is so
> > short
> > > of waiting for it to die?  Less than 1yr old WD
> > 80gb,
> > > should be under warranty yet.  
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance, 
> > > 
> > > Mark 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- Robert Meyer <meyer_rm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > --- Mark Robson <markrobson at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > Well, it will be there, then.  Even if I get
> > this
> > > > > solved meantime (LOL).  I guess you'll have
> > > > monitors
> > > > > to use, so I'll need to bring the kbd/mouse
> > and
> > > > box? 
> > > > 
> > > > Remember the meeting is the 28th, not the
> > 21st... 
> > > > Bring kbd and mouse 'cuz we
> > > > don't have any in the office.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Meantime, I seem to have lied when I said I
> > could
> > > > see
> > > > > both partitions on the 80gb drive.  When I go:
> > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /mnt/win 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I can get a view of the c: drive where my o/s
> > is
> > > > > installed, and the source for the files I want
> > to
> > > > > rescue.  I 'thought' I could just modify that
> > to :
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > mount -t vfat /dev/hda2 /mnt/winD 
> > > > > 
> > > > > to make the same view true for my D: partition
> > on
> > > > that
> > > > > same drive.  I have already created /mnt/winD.
> > 
> > > > > Instead, I get this complaint: 
> > > > > 
> > > > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad
> > superblock
> > > > on
> > > > > /dev/hda2, 
> > > > >        or too many mounted file systems 
> > > > >        (aren't you trying to mount an extended
> > > > > partition, 
> > > > >        instead of some logical partition
> > inside?) 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't remember making hda2 NTFS, but is that
> > > > likely
> > > > > the problem?  How would I determine that? 
> > > > 
> > > > Well, if you type 'fdisk /dev/hda' and then type
> > 'p'
> > > > to get it to print the
> > > > partition map, you should see what the partiton
> > > > types are set to.  If it's
> > > > NTFS, you need to have the ntfs modules
> > installed on
> > > > your machine.  The linux
> > > > NTFS modules are read only and write mode is
> > only
> > > > experimental.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is a 'bad superblock' as bad as it sounds? 
> > Can I
> > > > > determine that (considering my newbie-ness)? 
> > > > 
> > > > It either means that the filesystem is corrupted
> > > > hopelessly, not formatted or
> > > > the system doesn't understand the filesystem
> > type on
> > > > the drive.  It could also
> > > > mean that there isn't an hda2 partition on the
> > > > drive.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am trying to mount an extended partition,
> > not a
> > > > > logical partition insde; maybe I just need a
> > > > different
> > > > > option?  
> > > > > 
> > > > > I need to learn how to edit fstab to automate
> > this
> > > > > anyways, don't I.  Another of the skills I
> > haven't
> > > > yet
> > > > > picked up.  I wish I had the time to take
> > classes
> > > > to
> > > > > get this down.  I'm the proverbial one who
> > knows
> > > > just
> > > > > enough to get into trouble.  
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers!
> > > > 
> > > > Bob
> > > > 
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
> > > > design software
> > > > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > =====
> > > 
> > > Mark Robson
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
> > design software
> > > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
> > design software
> > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> =====
> 
> Mark Robson
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

-- 
Cyber Source <peter at thecybersource.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nflug.org/pipermail/nflug/attachments/20030918/4fc77bca/attachment-0001.html


More information about the nflug mailing list