Redhat

[Cyber Source]

I asked Bob the same thing, perhaps Bob could elaborate for the
group.... Bob?
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 00:02, Asheville Joe wrote:

> What does this mean to a desktop user?  Is RedHat going to continue to 
> bea viable system for end users (as opposed to enterprise users)?  I 
> know it's well thought of and widely used now and I know almost all the 
> rest of Linux was developed without companies, but when support systems 
> change, especially radically, it makes people nervous.  Do any of you 
> have a sense of what sort of developer support there is or will be for 
> Fedora?
> 
> Joe
> 
> Cyber Source wrote:
> 
> > Here's the story--> 
> > http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php?id=357123420&fp=16&fpid=0
> > <http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php?id=357123420&fp=16&fpid=0>
> > On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 09:31, Justin Bennett wrote:
> >
> >>/Did you guys see Redhat has spun off the Redhat 9 trunk. They are 
> >>focusing on the enterrpise. It's now an opensource project called Fedora./
> >>/http://fedora.redhat.com/
> >>
> >>Doesn't affect us that much, we are in the final stages of converting to 
> >>Redhat Enterpise anyways, was too much of a hassle to reload servers 
> >>every year when a new release came out ( especially our servers in 
> >>europe) and they stop making patches. It may affect those like Bob and 
> >>Pete that use it alot on the desktop.
> >>
> >>Justin/
> >>
> > -- Cyber Source <peter at thecybersource.com 
> > <mailto:peter at thecybersource.com>>
> >
> >
> >  
> >

-- 
Cyber Source <peter at thecybersource.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nflug.org/pipermail/nflug/attachments/20031007/b7430626/attachment-0001.html